
FosterHealth AI
Giving physicians full control over AI-generated clinical documentation
FosterHealth AI is a healthtech startup building AI-powered transcription tools to streamline clinical documentation and improve workflow efficiency. The product enables physicians to generate structured medical notes quickly while maintaining high accuracy and full control over their documentation.
I owned the UX design of a personalization feature for AI-generated clinical notes, enabling doctors to tailor outputs to their preferences. In a rapid MVP build, I collaborated closely with founder and engineering, supported internal QA and testing, and ensured the solution held up against real-world clinical workflows and operational constraints.
Doctors feel disconnected from AI-generated notes and often spend extra time re-editing them to match their personal tone, style, and documentation preferences.
I designed a customizable feature that enables doctors to create self-defined templates based on their past medical notes, allowing Foster to learn and generate AI-powered drafts that match their tone, structure, and writing style — while giving them the flexibility to edit templates as needed.


To understand the challenges doctors face with AI-generated documentation, we conducted interviews, workflow observations, and industry analysis to uncover both user needs and gaps in the current market.
The market is saturated with generic AI note solutions that focus on speed but fail to support the nuanced, deeply personal ways doctors document — leaving them editing AI content instead of trusting it.
By visualizing the current note-transcribing flow, we identified areas for improvement and pinpointed two primary pain points: the excessive editing time required to finalize documentation, and the lack of accuracy in the initial transcriptions.
Existing Documentation Experience:
New Documentation Experience with the personalized template:
There is a clear need for an AI documentation tool that lets doctors personalize templates using their own past notes — adapting to their voice, structure, and clinical context, while staying compliant with insurance standards.
After identifying key pain points in the current documentation process - particularly around editing time and transcription accuracy, we moved into the ideation and prototyping phase. We developed a series of low- and mid-fidelity wireframes to explore potential solutions aimed at streamlining the editing workflow and enhancing clarity in the user interface.
Our wireframes focused on simplifying the editing experience for doctors by introducing features such as inline editing, customizable templates, and visual indicators for low-confidence transcription segments. These concepts were brought into usability testing sessions with real users, including physicians and administrative staff.


During this exploration, I also conducted meetings with engineers to better understand technical constraints and possibilities. These cross-functional discussions helped ensure our solutions were not only user-centered but also technically feasible.
After internal testing and gathering feedback, I went through several rounds of iteration and eventually completed two key flows:



Distinct flows for first-time and returning users, with popup instructions guiding new users to the key modules.

Inline editing and customizable templates cut repetitive tasks, reducing average editing time by 30%.
Reduced setup time and simplified customization by optimizing the note upload process.
Guided pop-ups and a clearer UI helped first-time users navigate key modules, reducing training time.